4.30.15 Spinal TPP
This article originally appeared in the 4.30.15 issue of Metroland.
You may have caught wind about a bizarre firefight going on
between Obama and some prominent Democrats, most notably Elizabeth Warren, over
some trade agreements with catchy acronyms like TPP, TIPP, and TAFTA. This is been a train wreck waiting to happen
for a couple years; until now I haven’t paid much attention because the very
thought of trade agreements tends to make me drowzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…
What? Hey!
OK, I’m back. There are troubling
things aplenty with these agreements, one being the process of how they came
about. These agreements have been
negotiated for several years in secrecy among various countries’ “trade
representatives” who typically are “advised” by “industry leaders”. Got that?
Absolutely no transparency. Just
government and corporations. During the
last several years virtually everything we’ve learned about these agreements
have been via leaks. While major
corporations have had access and input, we regular folk have not, labor unions
have not, economic and legal scholars have not, environmental agencies have
not, human rights agencies have not. Why
the big secret? Remarkably, the official
word is that if people found out what was in these agreements, they’d never be
adopted. Which lead Senator Warren to
observe a couple of years ago “[i]f transparency would lead to widespread public
opposition to a trade agreement, then that trade agreement should not be the
policy of the United States.” Can I get a “duh”?
Well, maybe it’s a big secret that,
as Obama has been yelling, is actually in our best interests. We should just trust him. How much I would love to. How much we just can’t.
The little bit we know about these
things include an expanded role for something called “corporate sovereignty.” This is where a deliberative body of
international business mucky-mucks will preside over what are essentially
lawsuits brought by “investor-states” (meaning international corporations)
against countries that institute laws or policies that might diminish the
corporations’ profits. The countries can
be made to pay damages if this is found to be the case. Yes, you read that right.
Say a poor third world country,
tired of having huge corporations raping its environment with clear-cutting,
mining, particularly dirty industrial operations, etc. decides enough is enough
and enacts environmental laws patterned after those in place in the United
States. The poor third world country
would face an onslaught of highly paid corporate attorneys seeking compensation
on behalf of their “investor state” clients.
Say a big movie studio gets upset with a US court’s fair use copyright
ruling, or a pharmaceutical company doesn’t like a patent getting rejected, or
an agri-business conglomerate doesn’t like losing a commercial disparagement
case it brought against environmental activists? You see where we’re going here? Sickening, right?
Obama has been
uncharacteristically and disappointingly aggressive and disingenuous in his
defense of these treaties, resorting to the kind of corporate-hugging
doublespeak normally associated with Koch-funded Republicans. He’s demanding that opponents specify what
they don’t like about the treaties.
Well, (a) I just did, and (b) the sum total of my and everybody else who’s
not a high-level corporate stooge’s knowledge of the treaties comes from leaks,
because the full texts of the agreements are STILL SECRET! Obama argues that the treaties aren’t secret
because members of Congress can go the trade representative’s office and review
them. For god’s sake! The deal is that individual members of
Congress (just the actual members, no staff) can go to the office of the US Trade
Representative somewhere in Washington DC and look at the treaty while being
monitored by USTR staff because copying and note taking are not allowed! What country is this again?
Even worse, Obama is deriding
opponents as “conspiracy theorists” and just this week claimed that the
“corporate sovereignty” arguments are old news, because there are similar
provisions in NAFTA, a trade treaty that’s over 20 years old. This is just sad. It’s a John Boehner move. What corporate sovereignty is and how it
works has been expanding dramatically in recent years, and what we know about
these new treaties indicates new mechanisms by which corporations can run
roughshod over countries. Conspiracy
theorists? Really? It’s like we’re all Peter Finch and Obama has
turned into Ned Beatty screaming at us that we have all meddled with the primal
forces of goddamned nature. Give me a
break.
I’d like to think that this is yet
another Obama rope-a-dope, where he’s posturing in order to get what he
wants. Because I can’t believe that he
really wants these treaties as they appear to be, that he really approves of
the way this has all gone down, that he thinks that this three-card monte of a
process is how democracy ought to function.
But when I see him standing shoulder to shoulder with the likes of Mitch
McConnell and the one-percenter robber barons who are championing this travesty,
my heart sinks.
Paul Rapp is a local
intellectual property lawyer who endeavors to persevere and thinks the new Sean
Rowe EP is spectacular.